Legal Opinion

Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Luckel

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 18, 1941No. 3867PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’QUINN, Justice.

Mrs. Louisa Wisch died testate, October 11, 1925, seized and possessed of the land involved in this suit, leaving surviving her three children, Mrs. Hazel Saint, Leo H. Wisch, and Fred Wisch, and her husband, W. H. Wisch, who died since the institution of this suit. The following summary gives the material provisions of Mrs. Wisch’s will:

1. Out of the net proceeds or returns from said land, “by way of rents or otherwise” $600 per year be paid to the surviving husband, W. H. Wisch — Par. a of Item 3.

2. Expressing the belief that the land was “probably valuable oil property,”…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hill v. BrownTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  2. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. KishiTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  3. Houston Production Co. v. Mecom Oil Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  4. Rogers v. DayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. Hodges v. ChristmasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corporation v. WaltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  2. Cargill v. BuieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  3. Jones v. El Paso Natural Gas Products CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  4. Dyer v. Weedon, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1989
  5. Bagley v. HigginbothamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API