Legal Opinion
Gage v. Riverside Trust Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California
Decided December 10, 1906No. 1,223PublishedCited by 12 opinions
In Equity. On motions to vacate order for substituted service.
1Opinion of the Court
WEEEBORN, District Judge.
Said motions involve and depend largely upon the construction of section 8 of Act March 3, 1875, c. 137, 18 Slat. 472 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 513], which provides, among other things, as follows:
“That when in any suit, commenced in any circuit court of the United States, to enforce any legal or equitable lien upon or claim to, or to remove any in-cumbrance or lien or cloud upon the title to real or personal property within, the district where such suit ⅛ brought, one or more of the defendants therein shall not be an inhabitant of, or found within, the said district,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Galpin v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Davis & Farnum Manufacturing Co. v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Mellen v. Moline Malleable Iron WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Crabtree v. Aetna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Palmer v. GraySupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Smith v. SperlingDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
- Johnson v. IngersollCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933
- Mutual Life Insurance v. LottDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.