United States v. Bornemann
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California
At Law. Motion to quash indictment.
1Opinion of the CourtSawyer, J.
The caption of the indictment commences as follows: “At a stated term of the said court, begun and holdenat the city and *825county of San Francisco, within and for the district of California, on the first Monday of February in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and eighty^rc,” whereas it should have been eighty-eight, the word “five” by a clerical error having been written for the word “eight.” The oflense charged is alleged, in the body of the indictment, to have been committed on the 21st day of August, 1885, after the date when the grand jury is recited in the caption to have…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HinesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- State v. LitchSupreme Court of Vermont · 1860
- United States v. ThompsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan · 1853
- State v. DavidsonTexas Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stillman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- United States v. HowardDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1904
- The SaranacDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1904
- Burchett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1912
- United States v. ClarkDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.