Oliver v. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.
The appellants, Charles W. Oliver and his wife, Linda L. Oliver, brought an employment discrimina tion suit against the respondent, Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company (PNB), alleging that a company-wide policy which subjected employees to disciplinary proceedings for dishonest acts committed outside of employment was discriminatory because it had a disproportionate impact upon black employees. The trial court granted a directed verdict in favor of PNB, ruling that the disparate impact analysis was inapplicable to the present facts, and even if it did apply, the Olivers had failed to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Dothard v. RawlinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Connecticut v. TealSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Xieng v. Peoples National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Kumar v. Gate Gourmet, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. MadisonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
- Fell v. Spokane Transit AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Fell v. Spokane Transit AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1996
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.