In re Bowers
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
COSGRAVE, District Judge.
The respondent, chattel mortgagee, contends that the bankrupt was not a cafe or restaurant owner, and that if he was, a portion of the fixtures involved and included in the chattel mortgage is not fixtures of a cafe or a restaurant. The bankrupt operated what was known as the “Breakfast Club.” He served meals and drinks, not generally to the public, but to selected portions of the public who made special arrangements with him, such as clubs, employee organizations, etc. While ordinarily we think of a cafe or restaurant as a place where meals and drinks are served to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McLean v. AustraliaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923
- In re Patterson-MacDonald Shipbuilding Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1922
- In re Continental Producing Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1919
- Proprietors Realty Co. v. WohltmannSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1921
- State v. . ShoafSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re NathanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1951
- Salt Lake City v. Towne House Athletic ClubUtah Supreme Court · 1967
- In re Snow Camp Logging Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1958
- In re NathanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1951
- Nestle's Milk Products, Inc. v. Baker Importing Co., IncCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.