Legal Opinion

Barber v. Barber

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1924No. 2594PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*380By the Court,

Ducker, C. J.:

■ This is an action for divorce. For convenience the parties will hereafter be _referred-±a as husband and wife. The wife charged extreme cruelty in her complaint. The husband answered denying some of the facts charged and admitting others. A prior decree of divorce a mensa et thoro granted the husband by the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia was also pleaded in the answer as a bar to the wife’s alleged cause of action. She was granted a divorce. A motion for a new trial was made and denied, from which this appeal is taken.

*381On the trial of the case an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hunt v. . HuntNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Embry v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Cheever v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  4. Pressley v. LambIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Deegan Ex Rel. Neligh v. DeeganNevada Supreme Court · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gagnon Co., Inc. v. Nevada Desert InnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Cochran v. CochranSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  3. Deros v. SternNevada Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Aldabe v. AldabeNevada Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Sutherland v. SutherlandNevada Supreme Court · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API