Legal Opinion

Renderos v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided September 14, 2005No. CA CR 04-1056PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John Mauzy Pittman, Chief Judge.

The appellant in this criminal case was charged with sexual indecency with a child, a violation of Ark. Code Ann. § 5-14-110(a)(l) (Supp. 2003). After a jury trial, he was convicted of that offense, fined, and sentenced to imprisonment and community service. On appeal, he argues that his conviction is not supported by substantial evidence because there was no evidence that he “solicited” sexual contact with the victim. We disagree, and we affirm.

The test for determining the sufficiency of the evidence is whether the verdict is supported by substantial evidence,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Srivenugopala Gattem v. Alberto R. Gonzales, 1Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  2. People v. FramerNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1954

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Neely v. McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  2. Krol v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API