Renderos v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
John Mauzy Pittman, Chief Judge.
The appellant in this criminal case was charged with sexual indecency with a child, a violation of Ark. Code Ann. § 5-14-110(a)(l) (Supp. 2003). After a jury trial, he was convicted of that offense, fined, and sentenced to imprisonment and community service. On appeal, he argues that his conviction is not supported by substantial evidence because there was no evidence that he “solicited” sexual contact with the victim. We disagree, and we affirm.
The test for determining the sufficiency of the evidence is whether the verdict is supported by substantial evidence,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Srivenugopala Gattem v. Alberto R. Gonzales, 1Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- People v. FramerNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1954
3Cited by2 opinions
- Neely v. McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Krol v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018