Legal Opinion

Krol v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 24, 2018No. CR-18-355PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLarry D. Vaught, Judge

Micah Kenton Krol appeals his conviction by a Washington County Circuit Court jury of three counts of sexual indecency with a child, a Class D felony, in violation of Arkansas Code Annotated section 5-14-110(a)(2)(A) (Repl. 2013). On appeal, Krol argues that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction because the statute should be interpreted as requiring proof that the child consciously observed the indecent exposure of the defendant's genitals. He also argues that his conviction violates the Arkansas and federal constitutions' protections against double jeopardy. We disagree…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. BryanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. Robers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  5. State v. ColvinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Todd Hall v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2022
  2. Frederick Henderson v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API