Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Service Commission
Utah Supreme Court
1DissentLarson, Chief Justice
I dissent. Since the majority of the court have construed and interpreted the section of the statute involved in this case, which construction will henceforth be binding upon everyone; and since another case like this will probably never arise under the section as now written and construed, little purpose would be served by writing a dissenting opinion were it not for the fact that all seem agreed that the legislature should rewrite, amend or clarify the section. That the commission, utilities, legislature, bar, and others interested therein may better understand the difficulties of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mulcahy v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1941
- Salt Lake City v. Utah Light & Traction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1918
- McGrew v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1938
- Los Angeles & S. L. R. Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1932
- Gilmer v. Public Utilities CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.