Legal Opinion

United States v. Robert James Poole

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 17, 1986No. 84-5195PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CANBY, Circuit Judge:

Robert James Poole was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) by robbing the Culver City branch of the First Federal Savings Bank of California. Poole was indicted and tried on three counts of bank robbery; the jury was unable to reach a verdict on two counts. On appeal, Poole contends that the trial court should have suppressed the evidence that Poole gave a false name to an FBI agent. Also, Poole contends that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding expert testimony on the unreliability of eyewitness identifications. We conclude that the district court…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. John W. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. State v. BeySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  2. People v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. EnisIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. United States v. Victor Montano DislaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. People v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API