Legal Opinion

Barrett Browning v. Corrections

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided July 29, 2019No. 3:18-cv-01732Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT MILLICENT BARRETT-BROWNING, Plaintiff, v. No. 3:18-cv-1732 (JAM) CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, et al., Defendants. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO DISMISS Plaintiff works as a corrections officer and alleges that she has been the subject of discrimination by the defendants because of a disabling medical condition. I will grant in part and deny in part defendants’ motions to dismiss. BACKGROUND The following facts are set forth as alleged in the complaint.1 Plaintiff Millicent Barrett- Browning has worked for…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Garcetti v. CeballosSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API