Legal Opinion

Golden v. Golden

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 2, 1932No. 20735PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOullison, J.

This is an action to reform a deed. Parties will be referred to as they appeared in the lower court. Defendants answered and pleaded a special defense. Plaintiff replied to defendants’ answer. Defendants demurred to plaintiff’s reply. Defendants’ demurrer to plaintiff’s reply was by the court sustained. Defendants moved for judgment on pleadings, which motion was by the court sustained. Judgment rendered in favor of defendants, from which judgment plaintiff appeals to this court.

L. B. Golden, plaintiff herein, was the father of Prank J. Golden, deceased. Prances C. Golden was the widow of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Prigg v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  2. Vedder v. VedderCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  3. Autry v. First Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. State ex rel. Garland County v. BaxterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1882
  5. Curtis v. Yale Oil Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Midkiff v. Castle & Cooke, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Cities Service Oil Co. v. Geolograph Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  3. Maltby v. SumnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  4. Investors Royalty Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Cooke v. KinkeadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API