United States v. Nestor Sandoval Roca
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2Per curiam
Nestor Vladamir Sandoval Roca appeals the district court’s order denying as moot his Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g) motion for return of property. The general rule is that seized property should be returned to the rightful owner after criminal proceedings have terminated, “unless it is contraband or subject to forfeiture.” United States v. Chambers, 192 F.3d 374, 376 (3d Cir. 1999). Rule 41(g) allows a “person aggrieved ... by the deprivation of property [to] move for [its] return.”…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Ceverilo ChambersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Daniel GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. StevensCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- DirecTV, Inc. v. RawlinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Stanley A. AlbinsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- Carpenter v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
- Langford v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Parks v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- STILLWELL v. UNITED STATESDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2021
- Wysinger v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2025