Legal Opinion

In re S.K.G.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 16, 2018No. COA17-638Published

1Opinion of the Court

ARROWOOD, Judge.

Respondent, the putative father of S.K.G.1 , appeals from the interlocutory order of the trial court determining respondent's consent is not necessary to proceed with petitioners' adoption of S.K.G. For the following reasons, we affirm.

I. Background

Prior to the birth of S.K.G., the birth mother (the "mother") and her boyfriend (the "boyfriend") began making preparations for the adoption of S.K.G. Those preparations included meeting with an adoption counselor supervisor (the "counselor") from A Child's Hope, LLC, a licensed child-placing agency (the "Agency"), on 25 May 2016.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Caban v. MohammedSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Goldston v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Sharpe v. WorlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API