Legal Opinion
Ricalde v. Evonik Stockhausen, LLC
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided September 22, 2016No. 16-CA-178PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGravois, J.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff/appellant, Thomas A. Ricalde, appeals the summary judgment dismissing his whistleblower retaliation action brought against defendants/appellees, Evo-nik Stockhausen, LLC (“Evonik”) and Dr. Edwin Mereand. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the trial court’s granting of the summary judgment.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In 1998, Mr. Ricalde began working as a laboratory technician for Evonik at its chemical production facility in Garyville, Louisiana. The facility produced polyacry-late super absorbent products that were sold to customers such as Proctor and Gamble and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ross Milling Co. v. GilibertiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Mathes v. SchwingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Hale v. Touro InfirmaryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
- Pizani v. Progressive Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
- Muller v. Carrier Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jones v. ABC Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Lyle v. Brock Servs., LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Ammar Invs., LLC v. Certain Underwriters Lloyd'sLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Ammar Invs., LLC v. Certain Underwriters Lloyd'sLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Lucy Benitez Versus Ahmed Elsayed, Affirmative Insurance Company, and Louisiana Insurance Guaranty AssociationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.