Legal Opinion

State v. . Lassiter

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 22, 1935PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, O. J.

It may be doubted whether the evidence is sufficient to warrant a conviction under the decisions in S. v. Hege, 194 N. C., 526, 140 S. E., 80, and S. v. Mull, 193 N. C., 668, 131 S. E., 866. But, however this may be, the verdict is not sufficient to support a judgment. S. v. Barbee, 197 N. C., 248, 148 S. E., 249. It neither alludes to the warrant nor uses language to show a conviction of the offense charged therein. S. v. Shew, 194 N. C., 690, 140 S. E., 621. It is entirely consistent with the defendant’s contention that the possession was lawful. S. v. Mull, supra; S. v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. . HegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. State v. . HammondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. State v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. State v. . BarbeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. State v. . ShewSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. AlbartySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. State v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. State v. EllisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. State v. IngramSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. State v. GatlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API