Samuel v. Metropolitan Police Department
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment
• RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
This is a case where there simply is no “there” there. Ms. Laurie Samuel was forced to resign from the District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department because her visa expired and she could not obtain permanent residency status. Ms. Samuel claims that her employer, through human resources ■ director Ms. Diane Haines-Walton, withheld information from her that would have given her the opportunity to apply for a visa extension, which…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Alhayoti v. BlinkenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Alhayoti v. BlinkenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
- Arnoldi v. National Gallery of ArtDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Boshaw v. Midland Brewing CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
- Earle v. United States Securities and Exchange CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.