Legal Opinion
State v. Marquez
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided November 25, 1986No. 9298, 9299 and 9300PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIVINS, Judge.
Each of these cases involves the common appellate issue of whether a conviction resulting from a plea of nolo contendere may be used to enhance a sentence of an habitual criminal pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 31-18-17 (Cum.Supp.1986). On defendants’ motion, we consolidated the cases. Defendant Marquez raises an additional issue, pursuant to State v. Franklin, 78 N.M. 127, 428 P.2d 982 (1967), regarding improper cross-examination. For the reasons stated in the calendaring notice in Marquez’s case, we affirm on that additional issue, and for the reasons which follow, we…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- State v. FranklinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Federal Election Commission v. National Right to Work CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State v. TeagueTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. LinamNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- Harry E. Linam v. M. Jerry Griffin, Warden, New Mexico State Penitentiary, and Attorney General of the State of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. WoodruffNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. EvansWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. JordanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
- Jones v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1989
- Kipnis v. JusbascheNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.