Legal Opinion

Ainsworth v. First Bank of South Dakota

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1991No. 17161PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Chief Justice.

Lincoln and Elaine Ainsworth appeal from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict for all defendants. Ainsworths argue that the trial court erred in the admission of hearsay testimony and in instructing the jury. We affirm.

FACTS

This controversy centers around Larry Byrne’s attempt to develop a commercial coal-pelleting process, which he sought to patent. Byrne was financed by First Bank of South Dakota (Bank) and one of its officers, Bruce Walker. 1 Lincoln Ains-worth was hired by Byrne to market the process under a commissions contract.

Through Ainsworth’s marketing…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Garrett v. BankWest, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Shaffer v. Honeywell, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Dwyer v. ChristensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Lytle v. MorganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Alberts v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1963

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Nelson v. WEB Water Development Ass'n, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. High Plains Genetics Research, Inc. v. J K Mill-Iron RanchSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Sporleder v. Van LiereSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Cody v. Edward D. Jones & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Daktronics, Inc. v. McAfeeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API