Legal Opinion

Board of Supervisors of La. State v. Smack Apparel Co.

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided July 18, 2006No. CIV.A.04-1593PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND REASONS

LEMMON, District Judge.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs’ motions for summary judgment are GRANTED (Record Document Nos. 86 and 143). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is DENIED (Record Document Nos. 45 and 48).

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs Louisiana State University (LSU), the University of Oklahoma (OU), Ohio State University (OSU), and the University of Southern California (USC), along with their licensing agent, Collegiate Licensing Company (CLC), have sued defendant Smack Apparel Company and its principal, Wayne Curtiss, under the Lan-ham…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corporation v. Diversified Packaging CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  5. Boston Professional Hockey Association, Inc. v. Dallas Cap & Emblem Mfg., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Board of Supervisors for Louisiana State University Agricultural & Mechanical College v. Smack Apparel Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  2. University of Kansas v. SinksDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2008
  3. Abraham v. ALPHA CHI OMEGADistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2011
  4. DC Comics v. TowleDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013
  5. Board of Supervisors of the Louisiana State University v. Smack Apparel Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API