Legal Opinion

State v. Bainbridge

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1985No. 14544PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1984 OPINION NO. 65, ISSUED JUNE 21, 1984, IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN, AND THIS OPINION IS SUBSTITUTED THEREFOR.

BAKES, Justice.

Appellant was tried and convicted of first degree murder (felony murder, murder during the commission of a robbery) and robbery arid was sentenced to two concurrent fixed life sentences. He appeals both his conviction and his sentence. For the reasons set out below, appellant’s conviction must be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial. Additionally, we address other issues which deal with appellant’s conviction and which might arise as issues upon retrial.

I

The facts…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Davis v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. State v. NeedsIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. SivakIdaho Supreme Court · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Quick v. CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. PizzutoIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. CardIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. LankfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. AragonIdaho Supreme Court · 1984

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API