Legal Opinion

Petition of Dondero

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 25, 1947No. 3649PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, J.

The contention that section 1 of chapter 414 of the Revised Laws grants an appeal in all instances where a different procedure is not expressly provided ignores the provisions of section 2 that the uniform procedure adopted by that chapter applies only when “authorized by law.” The provisions of this chapter do not provide an appeal from the determination of every administrative agency in the state. Unless some reference is made to chapter 414 in any given statute, an appeal under the provisions of chapter 414 is not “authorized by law.” Consequently the decisions of the Ballot Law Commission…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barry v. United States Ex Rel. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Madden v. Board of Election CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  3. Greenwood v. Board of Registrars of VotersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. RichardsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1949
  2. Connell's New & Used Cars, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  3. In re LordenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  4. In re CraneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  5. New Hampshire-Vermont Physician Service v. DurkinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API