Legal Opinion

Halladay v. State Bank

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1923No. 5,025PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cooper

This is an action to recover damages for malicious prosecution. The complaint alleges that the defendants, with intent to injure the good name and reputation of the plaintiff, on October 16, 1916, appeared before the county attorney of Teton county and falsely, wrongfully, unlawfully, and maliciously caused to be instituted in the justice’s court of Chouteau township criminal proceedings charging the plaintiff with obtaining from the defendant bank, upon false representations and pretenses, the sum of $3,750; that a warrant was issued out of that court, delivered to the sheriff of Teton…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Martin v. CorscaddenMontana Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Johnson v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  4. Cornner v. HamiltonMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Moore v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Fletcher v. District Court of Nineteenth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. McClinton v. RiceArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Kittler v. KelschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  4. American Surety Co. v. PryorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. Gould v. ParkerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1945

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API