Legal Opinion

WJJK Investments, Inc. v. Licking County Board of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1996No. 95-2119PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

WJJK first contends that the assessment of its real property violates Section 2, Article XII of the Ohio Constitution, which states, “Land and improvements thereon shall be taxed by uniform rule according to value * *

In State ex rel. Park Invest. Co. v. Bd. of Tax Appeals (1964), 175 Ohio St. 410, 413, 25 O.O.2d 432, 434, 195 N.E.2d 908, 910, we stated: “Taxation by uniform rule within the requirement of the constitutional provision requires uniformity in the mode of assessment.” In this case WJJK contends that its property has “been valued in an entirely different manner than the comparable…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of WakefieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Tokles & Son, Inc. v. Midwestern Indemnity Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. R.R.Z. Associates v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Mahoning County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Simmons v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Worthington City Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Johnson v. Clark Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Johnson v. Clark Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Blatt v. Hamilton County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API