Kendrick v. Baca
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
The Kendricks contend that the district court erroneously determined that the defendants are entitled to qualified immunity. We affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Deputy Costleigh with respect to the search, but reverse with respect to the arrests. We affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Sheriff Baca in all respects.
We first consider whether the Kendricks have shown that the search of their residence violated their constitutional rights. See Sonoda v. Cabrera, 255 F.3d 1035, 1040 (9th Cir.2001). They allege only that the affidavit…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Balint v. Carson CityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. City of Tacoma, WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Kimberly Ann HoveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Terrence Wayne ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Sonoda v. CabreraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Volvo Trademark Holding Aktiebolaget v. AIS Construction Equipment Corp.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2006