Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Woosnam

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 12, 2003PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBowes, J.

¶ 1 At issue in this case is whether the trial court erred when it refused to instruct the jury that Appellant, Luann Woosnam, was guilty of leaving the scene of an accident involving death or personal injury of a person, 75 Pa.C.S. § 3742, if she knew or should have known that she was involved in an accident involving death or injury. We conclude that a mens rea element is a necessary component of a violation of this statute and the trial court’s failure to instruct the jury as to this element pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. § 302(b)(4) requires the grant of a new trial. We reverse and remand.

¶ 2 At…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Commonwealth v. GraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. ButlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Commonwealth v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KinneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Commonwealth v. PondSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Commonwealth v. HuntingtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Commonwealth v. Moran, ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Com. v. Arnold, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API