Legal Opinion

New v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 8, 1935No. 17558PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for swindling; punishment, ten years in the penitentiary.

In the case of New v. State (127 Texas Crim. Rep., 30), 74 S. W. (2d) 697, wherein this same appellant was before this court on appeal from a conviction for embezzlement, based on the exact facts and transaction made the basis of the instant charge and conviction now here appealed from, — we held the facts not to show embezzlement. In view of what might follow reversal in that case we said in our opinion as follows: “In view of the fact that another indictment must be returned if appellant is to be tried…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sherman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Hoovel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. De Blanc v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Contreras v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bomar v. Insurors Indemnity & InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Speckels v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Carroll v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
  5. Speckels v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API