Legal Opinion

King v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 20, 1992PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on two petitions for writs of certiorari following the granting of petitioner-respondent’s application for postconviction relief (PCR).

The order of Judge Bristow found that petitioner-respondent did not knowingly and intelligently waive his right to appellate review of an order of Judge Mobley denying his prior PCR application. Austin v. State, — S.C. —, 409 S.E. (2d) 395 (1991). We grant the petition for a writ of certiorari from Judge Bristow’s order, dispense with further briefing, and proceed to review the order of Judge Mobley.

After careful…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  2. Austin v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Odom v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Whitehead v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Mack v. State of SCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2021
  4. State v. LadsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  5. State v. LadsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API