Boston Block Co. v. Buffington
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of tbe municipal court of Minneapolis. Tbe clause of the lease on which tbe question of tbe erasure of the word “second” arises is as follows: “To have and to bold said premises for the full term of five years from and after the 1st day of August, 1882, with privilege of five years longer, after second five years tbe rooms every five years to pro rate higher or lower as per rooms on third floor Hennepin avenue front.”
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
Appeal from a judgment of the municipal court oi Minneapolis, in an action of unlawful detainer. Tbe respondent moves to dismiss, on tbe ground that an appeal will not lie from that •court to the supreme court in this class of actions. Tbe contention is.that, as the statute (Gen. St. 1878, e. 64, § 121) giving tbe municipal court jurisdiction of actions of forcible entries and unlawful detainers provides that chapter 84 of tbe General Statutes shall apply to that court, therefore an appeal will lie only to the district court, as provided in that chapter in case of an appeal from a justice of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lewis v. PaynCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1827
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lilienthal v. TordoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Pushor v. DaleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Anderson v. GoetzeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Universalist General Convention v. BottineauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Tellock v. BackholmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952