Legal Opinion

Hart v. Easson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 10, 1938No. 28184PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CORN. J.

This is an appeal, by transcript, from an order of the trial court sustaining a demurrer to the petition of plaintiff and entering judgment on the pleadings in favor of the defendants Shade, Turk, and Barnsdall Oil Company, and in sustaining a motion to quash by the defendants Easson, and dismissing the petition of plaintiff as to said defendants.

One feature of the case involves the doctrine of res adjudicata, and it is deemed essential to a proper understanding of the case that the statement of facts begin with the inception of the controversy. On February 6, 1934, the defendants…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Howe v. Farmers & Merchant BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Uphoff v. MeierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API