Legal Opinion

Warren v. Harris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 13, 1992PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

It is well established that judicial review of a determination rendered by an administrative body after a hearing is limited to whether that determination is supported by substantial evidence upon the entire record (see, CPLR 7803 [4]; Matter of Purdy v Kreisberg, 47 NY2d 354, 358; 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 181; Matter of City of New York v Hartnett, 168 AD2d 555; Matter of Furey v County of Suffolk, 105 AD2d 41). In this case, there was both testimonial and documentary evidence offered by the respondent Rider that his proposed sewage disposal system…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Purdy v. KreisbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Furey v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. 215 East 72nd Street Corp. v. KleinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  5. Berka v. SeltzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Efraim v. TrottaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. North Shore F.C.P., Inc. v. MamminaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Thirty West Park Corp. v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Matter of 790 Holdings Corp. v. Board of Appeals of the Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
  5. Peter Glennon Buick-Cadillac, Inc. v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API