Legal Opinion

Krystal Development Corp. v. Rose

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 31, 1997No. 1413PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant, Jeffrey L. Rose, t/d/b/a Piney Knoll Construction, brings this appeal from the non-jury verdict dated and entered on the docket on June 6, 1997. Because no issues have been preserved for appellate review, the appeal is quashed.

This dispute concerns the plaintiff’s allegation that Mr. Rose breached a contract for the application of exterior stucco to a residence being constructed by the plaintiff. A non-jury trial was conducted by The Honorable Daniel J. Ackerman, judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County, on June 5 and 6,1997. On June 6,1997, the trial court entered…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Manor Junior College v. Kaller's Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Brown v. Philadelphia Tribune Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Fred E. Young, Inc. v. Brush Mountain Sportsmen's Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Fernandes v. Warminster Municipal AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Matthews v. JoinesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Diamond Reo Truck Co. v. Mid-Pacific Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Lenhart v. Cigna CompaniesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Amerikohl Mining, Inc. v. Mount Pleasant TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Plowman, Spiegel & Lewis, P.C. v. StraubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. AB Rhodes v. Dick, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API