Lindner v. Lindner
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Shepherd,' P.J.
This is a divorce case in which the trial court granted a declaratory judgment in favor of the wife, ruling that the inclusion of the husband’s teacher’s pension plan as a marital asset for purposes of equitable distribution did not violate MCL 38.1346(1); MSA 15.893(156X1), which makes such pensions immune from legal process. We affirm and remand for a trial on the merits.
We recently held that all assets of the parties, whether owned jointly or separately, are considered marital assets for property settlement purposes in light of the Michigan statute which allows the court to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hutchins v. HutchinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Hatcher v. HatcherMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Grotelueschen v. GrotelueschenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Young v. YoungMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Bywater v. BywaterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rice v. RiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Snyder v. Tucson Police Public Safety Personnel Retirement System BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Bone v. BoneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Fulton v. FultonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Foley v. Foley, No. 32 35 19 (Nov. 4, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.