Legal Opinion

People v. Forshay

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 25, 1995No. Docket Nos. A066779, A066780PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CORRIGAN, J.

Herein, we hold defendant cannot object for the first time on appeal to the imposition of a restitution fine on the ground of an inability to pay. Defendant appeals from separate judgments following (1) his plea of guilty to second degree murder and his admission of the use of a deadly weapon and the intentional infliction of great bodily injury, and (2) the revocation of his probation as a result of that plea. He alleges error only in the court’s order of restitution and a restitution fine. We, in large part, affirm the judgments, remanding solely for the determination of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. People v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People v. ZitoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. People v. CotterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. McCulloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. People v. BlackburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. People v. ValtakisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. People v. GillardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. People v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API