Pinnacle Health Hosps. v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY JUDGE McCULLOUGH
Pinnacle Health Hospitals (Employer) petitions for review of the June 26, 2018 order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board), which affirmed the decision of a referee finding David L. Lisco (Claimant) eligible for unemployment compensation (UC) benefits. This case presents an issue of first impression with regard to the mailbox rule. Specifically, we are asked to clarify what constitutes a regular place of mailing for purposes of application of the presumption of receipt. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand.
Facts and Procedural…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Blast Intermediate Unit 17 v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Christie v. Open Pantry Food Marts, Inc. of Delaware ValleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Whitmore v. Dwelling House Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Sheehan v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Douglas v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Angels of Care by TLM, LLC v. DHSCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
- K. Guss v. City of Philadelphia Bd. of Pensions & RetirementCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- M.E. McFadden v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Pinnacle Health Hospitals v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020