Legal Opinion
Douglass v. Spokane County
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 27, 2003No. 21002-2-IIIPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Brown, C. J. —
The superior court annulled certain Utility Local Improvement District (ULID) assessments imposed by Spokane County (County) against parcels held by Harlan and Maxine Douglass and their son, Lanzce. About 10 years earlier, the parcels were connected to the Spokane sewerage system in connection with a county road project after payment of facility charges to the County. The County appealed. We decide whether the trial court erred in deciding (1) the Douglasses’ properties were not specially benefited, (2) the ULID improvements and prior improvements did not form a single,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Teter v. Clark CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Abbenhaus v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re SchmitzWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- Bellevue Associates v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Doolittle v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tiffany Family Trust Corp. v. City of KentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Tiffany Family Trust Corp. v. City of KentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003