Legal Opinion

Weinstein v. Ken-Wel Sporting Goods Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 5, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.

The plaintiff moved for judgment on the pleadings or, in the alternative, to strike out certain portions of the defense and two counterclaims. The learned court at Special Term granted the motion in so far as to strike out certain allegations from the defense and first counterclaim and the entire second counterclaim, with leave to defendant to serve an amended answer. Plaintiff appeals from the order in so far as it denied the complete relief which she asked for. Defendant does not appeal.

The complaint is based upon the sale and delivery by the plaintiff’s assignor of merchandise for an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Richard Deeves & Son v. Manhattan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. International Milk Co. v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  3. Botts v. Mercantile Bank of MemphisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  4. Mastin v. BolandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Toll v. FriedmanNew York Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Raymond v. DavyCity of New York Municipal Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API