Legal Opinion
Huck v. Philadelphia Consolidated Holding Corp.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided October 16, 2020No. 1:19-cv-03336Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION RONALD HUCK and PEGGY HUCK, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. v. 1:19-cv-0 3336-SDG PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendant Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company’s (Philadelphia) motion to dismiss [ECF 31]. For the reasons stated below, Philadelphia’s motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. I. BACKGROUND The following facts are treated as true for purposes of this…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- American Dental Assoc. v. Cigna Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Bryant v. Avado Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.