Legal Opinion

Hollis v. Hollis

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 1916No. Appeal, No. 460PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal, No. 460, Jan. T., 1916, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Berks Co., Equity Docket, 1914, No. 1133, in equity, dismissing bill to declare an oral trust in case of Jobn G. Hollis v. Martin G. Hollis. Bill in equity for the declaration and enforcement of an oral trust.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 460, Jan. T., 1916, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Berks Co., Equity Docket, 1914, No. 1133, in equity, dismissing bill to declare an oral trust in case of Jobn G. Hollis v. Martin G. Hollis. Bill in equity for the declaration and enforcement of an oral trust. Endlich, J., filed the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: 1. Maria G. Hollis died Oct. 8, 1911, the owner of a candy manufacturing business and of a four-fifths interest in certain real estate in the City of Beading, (the remaining one-fifth interest belonging to a daughter, Julia, residing in Greece,) —…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This decree is affirmed, at the costs of the appellant, on the facts found by the learned chancellor below.

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mader v. StemlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Rocks v. SheppardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Estate of Agnes BlaszcakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Gribbel v. GribbelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. DANNER v. DannerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API