Legal Opinion

People v. Arroyo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 13, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress the statement he made to a detective, prior to any Miranda warnings, as he was being placed under arrest. During this process of moving defendant from an interview room to a cell, the detective asked defendant an innocuous question about whether he understood what was happening; in context, this question did not reasonably appear to have anything to do with the facts of the case. Thus, the detective’s question was not reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response (see People v Rivers, 56 NY2d 476, 480 [1982]; People v Lynes, 49…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. People v. RiversNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. DormNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. People v. LynesNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. People v. LeesonNew York Court of Appeals · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. BraceyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. People v. DeanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  3. People v. DeanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API