Legal Opinion
Swanson v. Wiesenfeld
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 16, 1953PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
24 N.J. Super. 576 (1953)
95 A.2d 161
LAURA H. SWANSON AND VICTOR H. SWANSON, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
PAUL C. WIESENFELD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND SOL GURSHMAN, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 15, 1952.
Decided February 16, 1953.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, GOLDMANN and FRANCIS.
Mr. Samuel Milberg argued the cause for the plaintiffs-respondents (Mr. Victor Ruskin, attorney).
Mr. John E. Toolan argued the cause for the defendant-appellant (Messrs. McGlynn, Weintraub & Stein, attorneys; Mr. Edward R. McGlynn, of counsel).
The opinion of the court was delivered…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hager v. WeberSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Kress v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Callahan v. National Lead Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Capone v. NortonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Schwartz v. Howard Savings InstitutionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kaplan v. HainesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Lewis v. ReadNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Garland Moore v. Guthrie Hospital, Inc., a Corporation, and Dr. William GuthrieCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968