Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Stanley

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 25, 1987No. 86-393Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Justice Brennan,

with whom

Justice Marshall joins, and with whom Justice Stevens joins as to Part III, concurring in part and dissenting in part.

In experiments designed to test the effects of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), the Government of the United States treated thousands of its citizens as though they were laboratory animals, dosing them with this dangerous drug without their consent. One of the victims, James B. Stanley, seeks compensation from the Government officials who injured him. The Court holds that the Constitution provides him with no remedy, solely because his injuries were…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API