City Welding & Mfg. Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Craig,
The pivotal question which the court must presently address regards the burden of proof which a claimant must sustain under section 413 of The Pennsylvania Workmens Compensation Act1 in order to warrant a reinstatement of benefits after the claimant has signed a final receipt.
On March 27, 1978, claimant Charles Williams suffered a work-related injury when acid splashed into his *574left eye. The claimant received compensation pursuant to a Notice of Compensation Payable beginning the day after his disability, March 28, 1978, until he returned to work on April 5, 1978. On…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sheibley v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Dunmore School District v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Memorial Osteopathic Hospital v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Rose v. Horn & Hardart Baking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Thiele, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
3Cited by1 opinion
- Coover v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991