Legal Opinion

Sheibley v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 5, 1984No. Appeals, Nos. 430 C.D. 1982 and 3316 C.D. 1982PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Palladino,

Section 434 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act)1 provides that a referee may set aside a final receipt “if it be shown that all disability due to the injury in fact bad not terminated.” These consolidated appeals address tbe question of what burden of proof a workmen’s compensation claimant *30must meet to satisfy Section 434’s requirement. We present the factual and procedural history of each case separately, followed by our resolution of the question of law.

430 C.D. 1982

Claimant, Eleanor Sheibley, worked for ARA Food Services Company as an Assistant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Whitehead v. Casey Building Wreckers, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Nemitz v. Air Services InternationalCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Bun v. Central Pennsylvania Quarry, Stripping & Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Jerry Green & Sons v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hartner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Jeanes Hospital v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Dunmore School District v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Hutter v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Simeone v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API