Eidos Display, LLC v. Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is a Motion by Eidos Display LLC, Eidos III, LLC, and Gary Rubloff (collectively, “Eidos” or “Plaintiffs”) for an Order Precluding Discovery Sought in a Third Party Subpoena or, in the Alternative, Limiting Discovery (hereinafter “Eidos’ Mot.”); Defendant Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd.’s (hereinafter “CPT” or “Defendant”) Opposition to the Motion; and Plaintiffs’ Reply to the Opposition. Plaintiffs filed this motion to prevent the deposition of Dr. Gary Rubloff, who they contend is a non-testifying expert not subject…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Alexander v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. Pure Air on Lake Ltd., PartnershipDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1993
- United States v. Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Plymovent Corp. v. Air Technology Solutions, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2007
- United States v. Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Abraha v. Colonial Parking, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Dameron v. Mercy Hospital & Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 2020
- Dameron v. Mercy Hospital & Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 2020
- Abraha v. Colonial Parking, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Brasfield & Gorrie LLC v. Hirschfeld Steel Group LPDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.