Legal Opinion

Plymovent Corp. v. Air Technology Solutions, Inc.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided August 2, 2007No. Civ.A. No. 05-351 (JEI)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

IRENAS, Senior District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the appeal of Biological Controls, Inc. (“Biological”) from the Magistrate Judge’s Order Quashing a Subpoena Duces Tecum seeking disclosure of materials of a nontestifying expert. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will affirm the order.

I

This is a lawsuit between competitors who manufacture diesel exhaust removal systems, which are used primarily in fire stations. Both systems are meant to remove exhaust emissions from indoor garages. Biological’s system, “AirMATION,” filters air through a unit mounted on the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Haines v. Liggett Group Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  2. House v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
  3. FMC Corp. v. Vendo Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2002
  4. Adams v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1990
  5. Mantolete v. BolgerDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Silvia Font de Bardón v. Mini-Warehouse Corp.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2010
  2. Tellabs Operations, Inc. v. Fujitsu Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
  3. DMS Constr. Ents., L.L.C. v. HomickOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. U.S. Inspection Services, Inc. v. NL Engineered Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
  5. Eidos Display, LLC v. Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API