Legal Opinion

State v. McCormick

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1994No. S-93-1065, S-93-1066 and S-93-1067PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

This case involves three codefendants, Charles Raymond McCormick, David Eugene Hall, and Bryle Edward Radden. On June 11,1993, at a hearing on defendants’ motions for new trial, the district court for Sarpy County ordered the State to disclose the name of a confidential informant the State used in the prosecution of the defendants. The State refused and timely appealed the district court’s order to the Nebraska Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals denied, without comment, the State’s application by prosecutor for leave to docket error proceedings. This court granted the State’s petition for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mullendore v. SCH. D. NO. 1 OF LANCASTER CTY.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Duggan v. BeermannNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Maack v. School District of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. McCormickNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Employers Reinsurance Corp. v. Santee Public School District No. C-5Nebraska Supreme Court · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. NissenNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Putnam v. FortenberryNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Kramer v. MiskellNebraska Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API