Legal Opinion

Carstensen v. Gottesburen

California Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1932No. Docket No. L.A. 13280PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

From a judgment entered in favor of plaintiffs the defendant Gottesburen alone appeals.

The complaint contains allegations usual to the statement of a cause of action in claim and delivery and prays for the return of a fishing barge known as the “Point Loma”. In his answer the appellant denies plaintiffs’ ownership of the property; denies demand for possession by plaintiffs; denies that at the time the action was filed he was retaining possession without the consent of plaintiffs; admits his possession and asserts his right thereto; and also asks for a return of the property with damages. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Oakland Barge & Lighter Co. v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnston v. JohnstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. International Atlas Services, Inc. v. Twentieth Century Aircraft Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Garetson v. HesterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Guerin v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Shaw v. Guaranty Liquidating Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API