Legal Opinion

(SS) Ealy v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 30, 2019No. 2:18-cv-01084Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RANDY EALY, No. 2:18-cv-1084 DB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security,1 15 16 Defendant. 17 18 This social security action was submitted to the court without oral argument for ruling on 19 plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment.2 20 Plaintiff’s motion argues that the Administrative Law Judge’s treatment of the medical opinion 21 evidence, subjective testimony, and step five conclusion were erroneous. 22 //// 23 24 1…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Tackett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API