Legal Opinion

State v. Trepanier

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 24, 1996No. 96-0601-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMyse, J.

Terry Thomas Trepanier appeals a portion of his judgment of conviction requiring payment of $250 to the State's DNA databank program and the order denying the subsequent motion for postconviction relief. Trepanier contends that § 973.046, Stats., requiring this payment, is unconstitutional as violating equal protection because convicted burglars are the only persons required to pay the DNA surcharge without regard to whether a DNA sample is given. Because there is no rational basis for designating burglars as a class to pay the surcharge regardless whether a sample is given, we hold that the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State Ex Rel. Strykowski v. WilkieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State Ex Rel. Hammermill Paper Co. v. La PlanteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State v. McManusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Mulder v. Acme-Cleveland Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Telemark Development, Inc. v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
  2. State Ex Rel. Griffin v. LitscherCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
  3. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
  4. State Ex Rel. Saffold v. SchwarzCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API