State v. Trepanier
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtMyse, J.
Terry Thomas Trepanier appeals a portion of his judgment of conviction requiring payment of $250 to the State's DNA databank program and the order denying the subsequent motion for postconviction relief. Trepanier contends that § 973.046, Stats., requiring this payment, is unconstitutional as violating equal protection because convicted burglars are the only persons required to pay the DNA surcharge without regard to whether a DNA sample is given. Because there is no rational basis for designating burglars as a class to pay the surcharge regardless whether a sample is given, we hold that the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Strykowski v. WilkieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- State Ex Rel. Hammermill Paper Co. v. La PlanteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. McManusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
- Mulder v. Acme-Cleveland Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Telemark Development, Inc. v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Griffin v. LitscherCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
- State Ex Rel. Saffold v. SchwarzCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001